I Don't Wear Beige for a Fucking Reason

zara's picture

There's this old saying... "If you stand for nothing, you'll fall for anything."

I was prompted to think about this due to some conversing that's been going on between good ol' Sammy and myself about another person who used to be fairly close to me in the MySpazz world. The concept was brought up that she thought it was her "neutrality" that drew people to respecting her.

How mistaken she was. At least, from my perspective.

I have another MySpazz friend who is an ultimate darling in my life and means exactly what she means to me, even though she chooses to remain friends with other people who hate my guts. Lesley might just be the exception to the rule, but I believe that there are people out there in this world who can choose hypothetical sides while still walking precariously in the middle of the road.

With me, if you haven't been able to pick it up by now, I am a left or right side of road girl. Hot or cold. Loving or bitchy. If you really care to look at it that way. However, in order to obtain a true "warm" side, you've got to be able to accomplish the extremes.

Some shit went down on MySpazz between my Sammy and someone that I don't know of and could care less to take the time to get to know. I've got too much on my hands already to be bothered with that shit anymore. Since I was once in the thick of it, I have no desire to get knee deep in the stench again.

While Sammy could have chosen to be upset with me for not coming to her side (the main reason why I didn't get defensive was because I was that ultimate abbreviation "AFK" (Away from keyboard... doing the whole E, extroverted, living my real life thing), she didn't. And even if she'd asked me, I don't think I would have taken the defensive side.

I left a comment on her page which spoke how I felt about the debacle that I'd missed out on. "Those who matter don't mind and those who mind don't matter."

Now, if it had been a close friend (or someone that we assumed was supposed to be a close friend) who had decided to unleash some venom, you'd better be damn sure that I'd have unleashed a fury that no person wants to come into contact with. I do not tolerate fighting from within. We are a family, and we are a smart family. One smart enough than to do that kind of shit to one another.

Those who are important to me will always feel it. I will make sure of it to the best of my scatter-brained ability. I will defend you to the deepest cut, slap sense into you when you need it, and basically just give you that feeling that even when I'm not around, I'm there.

Caroline was wildly mistaken in her assumption that I chose to cut her out of my personal circle because of her neutrality. I can accept when people choose to be friends with other people that I do not care for. That is their choice and I am all about allowing people to make their own decisions. In my line of work, I see kind and compassionate people have their "best interests" decided for them all the time, completely out of their full control. So I do not choose to impose my will on others.

But I draw the line at choosing to be friends with people for my OWN sake. That is MY choice, my decision for MY best interests and has NOTHING to do with the other person and their choices.

I cut Caroline out of my circle because I myself am not neutral. I do not support everything. I do not see a brighter side of every situation, a golden opportunity within every circumstance. Because as deliriously delicious that might sound, it's also just delusional.

I know who is important to me. I make my choices from there. Then I feel bad for the people who can't come to the decision what's (or who's) really important to them.

I'm not talking about Top 8's or Top 40's. I'm talking your personal friendship compass.

You don't need to fight battles for them, because if they understood that you had their back, they would never expect you to draw blood.

You don't need to defend them because you know that they are smart enough, strong enough, capable enough to do it themselves and that you yourself have made the effort to give them the confidence that they require to be that way.

I am a better person in my life because of Sammy, Lesley, Sole, Misty, Cyndy, Adie, Lark (as for my online girlies) and Paul, Stuey, Scott, Tim, Michael, Joel and of course Brandon (as for my online boys). Any one of them could ask the world of me and I would hand it over without a second thought.

But I know in my heart, I could get the same in return from them.

Because the warmest hearts are willing to burn hot and know when to give the icy shoulder.

I didn't make up the rules. It's just how it is. Neutrality isn't chosen. Neutrality is a learned and EARNED trait.

Comments

Budo7's picture

I have few friends

but I know a lot of people. Seems to me that those people that I know (not my friends), do not understand what the word friend means.
Some must think it means that you say hello to the same person every day they are your friend. Does that sound right?

Gina the Ninja BAMF's picture

Hmmm...

If it's a conflict between two of my friends, I just try to not get involved in the first place. Because I know that no matter what I say, everybody's gonna get pissed at me, so I always change the subject and don't give a damn.

But I'm always one to start defending a friend if some stranger starts badgering them unnecessarily.

I have friends that hate each other, but that doesn't make them change their opinions of me just because I am still friends with someone else. I don't make petty friendships like that. If I am found in the mistake of making friendships like that, I have no problem making them obsolete from my life. Dunno if that has anything to do with neutrality...

That's right... ALL the cheesecake.

Heather the Angel's picture

fuck the line....

I've never been one to walk the line. I just don't have the balance or the patience. Sometimes I'll play devil's advocate just to ruffle feathers. But when it comes down to it, I love my friends, and I will fight tooth and nail to defend them.

I am lucky to have so many friends. Most of my myspazz friends are people I know in my real life. Occasionally, I go through and delete a few... trying to keep my number of friends to a manageable level. My strategy is this. My life revolves around my son. I have very little time in the day to deal with anyone else and their collective bullshit. I shovel enough of my own. However, my friends, much like me, are passionate creatures. Hence, I'm drawn to these people.

I recently got into a shit slinging match with the previously mentioned ass. Many of Sam's friends jumped in to defend our girl! The idiot would not relent, even writing a blog about yours truly. I made my point, repeatedly, he even made my point for me in his rantings. So I decided to be the bigger dick and drop it.

I inherited my mother's big mouth. She endowed me with the ability to cut a bitch down with one swipe of my double edged tongue.

I don't keep friends who don't contribute to my life... meaning valuable input, insight, etc.... I value my friends, because I have hand picked them. I value their opinion because I respect them and what they have to say.

"I didn't make up the rules. It's just how it is. Neutrality isn't chosen. Neutrality is a learned and EARNED trait."

A person who likes to stay neutral isn't truly open. They are too busy walking an imaginary line to see the scenery on either side. I can't relate.

AnneGwish's picture

Ahhhh...yesh

...I don't do neutral either. To me, neutral = doormat, and I don't particularly enjoy having bootprints on my back. I played that role in some shitty 90's movie that disguised itself as my life, and I tired of it pretty quick. Now, don't get me wrong, I don't mind letting my vulnerable side show through amongst friends, people I give a shit about and that give a shit about me. (Shit seems to be my word o' the day, sorry) However, I'm not just gonna let you shank me when my back is turned.

I can remember when I first discovered your AZ blog on myspace and I thought you were great from the word "go". I was pissed off that I had missed so much. I was all like *shaking fist at the sky* "Why didn't somebody tell me?!" I devoured your blogs every day, read the entirety of your archives and there was one thing that I loved about you more than the rest. You were so Real to me, so balls-out, take-no-prisoners true to you and I loved it. It reminded me of, well, ...me. :o) Only more popular and an incredible writer. I think you've got pretty good taste in friends....haha...I don't know all of them, but I adore Misty and Adie and Paul, and I always love reading what Sam and Sole & Lesley have to say in their responses. As for that eager-to-please diplomatic lawyergirl, meh, never much cared for her or her type.

sole's picture

Aw shucks...

She mentioned me! Thank you for that. I'm a better person because of you too. *blushing* Tee hee.

I have always been an all or nothing type of person. I am loyal to a fault. I will literally throw down for those I love and I will do whatever is in my power to help them when they are in need. I haven't always been sure if this part of my personality is an asset because for one thing, people don't always display the same loyalty in return (not that I'm expecting the same - not many people are capable of that), it can be interpreted as irrational because I don't always care to hear the other side of the story, and it has led me to a lot of heartache in my life. But in my old age, I'm starting to take inventory of the things about me that I may not be interested in changing even though they are not considered positive aspects. I don't strive for perfection. I do strive to be kind, fair, understanding and a good person. But if backing up my loved ones to the death makes me immature and irrational, then so be it. Just don't call them that or you will hear it from me.

I think I became close to you because I was never really a MySpace blog fan, I was a Zara fan. You found me and I was hooked. It wasn't about the blogging for me - it was about you and your writing. And all the things we had in common just made me relate to you more.

To Sam:
I didn't catch the whole debate until a few days later because I don't always check bulletins everyday. By the time I saw it, it just looked like the aftermath of a pointless shit-flinging fest initiated by some antagonistic loser who was just trying to get readers. I didn't comment because I honestly felt that this whole drama fest was just beneath you. You wrote a helpful blog (I didn't have anything to contribute because I don't really blog much and any issues I've encountered were mentioned) and you needed to advertise it - for a good cause. People blogdick all the time, every single day, in every single blog. He was just an asshole and Sam, you really are too good a writer and too good a person to let someone like that drag you down into their bullshit. Lonely losers like him grow from the attention you give them. Instead of giving them the fight they want, I think it's best to ignore them. But that's just me and you are a feisty one so you dealt with him as you saw fit. And I would feel hurt too if I was in a situation like that and someone I was close to decided not to take sides. I went through something like that in my last job and it really affected my friendship with the "neutral" friend. Good riddance, I say.

*Sole*

lrk1977's picture

You know I love you!

I feel like a little kid "Yay! SHE mentioned me!" But I also feel unworthy "Me?? She is a better person because of ME? Is that a typo?"

I've actually never considered myself "neutral". Sometimes it takes me longer to understand people and their motives. Many of the friends (including Caroline) that used to be part of the whole AZ crowd - that either went off the deep end or somehow showed their true selves to you - that were deleted by you eventually showed me the true reason themselves. (God, reading that back it doesn't make sense!) Often times, I didn't understand why you deleted someone. BUT more often than not I learned the hard way in my own time why they truly did deserve to be deleted. So, again, I don't think it's as much neutrality as it is naive-ity (sp?). It's hard for me to see the bad in people, typically I try to focus on the good until the bad sneaks up and bites me on the ass. As I've gotten older, I've learned some things, but essentially I am not too bright in understanding and reading people. There's something in me that is broken in that regards and in some ways I have that childlike trust in others - and I truly HATE that about myself.

I actually don't know what friends I've kept that have a hate relationship with you. Most of the friends that you deleted, I've ended up distancing myself from and deleting as well. There is one or two that I haven't deleted, but that I have distanced myself from and am watching. Why haven't I deleted them? Maybe it's because I am hoping that they aren't as bad as I think they may be. I'm hoping for the best to shine through. *shrug*

I'm glad you know me well enough to understand me. Sometimes you understand me better than I understand myself. And if any of those people attacked you, I would correct them and delete them immediately - but I think you already know that.

Interesting blog and I AM a BETTER person because of YOU! I have learned more about myself and my friends in the past year than I have prbly my whole life. Seriously. If nothing else, I hope you've learned that being outspoken and selective doesn't make you a bitch - it just means you're outspoke and selective! For some reason people equate having an opinion and voicing it as being a bitch - I think it means you have a superior brain! But that's just me! :)

(sorry I got so long winded!)

Lesley from Minnesota :)